<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>steverossen.com &#187; IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steverossen.com/category/it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steverossen.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on my journey in the world of networking...with a little bit of whatever else I am doing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:47:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No the network is not down!</title>
		<link>http://steverossen.com/no-the-network-is-not-down/</link>
		<comments>http://steverossen.com/no-the-network-is-not-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rossen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steverossen.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you worked for any amount of time supporting networks you most likely have had to tell someone the network is fine immediately after they told you it was down. In fact this has been said some much that Solarwinds even included the phrase on a number of their marketing materials. But how many times [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you worked for any amount of time supporting networks you most likely have had to tell someone the network is fine immediately after they told you it was down. In fact this has been said some much that Solarwinds even included the phrase on a number of their marketing materials. But how many times have you verified this the case before telling the user definitely? You should. I was on the reverse end of a quick dismissal recently and it got me thinking. Here is the story</p>
<p>A few weeks ago I decided to signup to get the <a href="www.groupon.com">Groupon</a> emails and something odd happened. I got a different email then mine on the confirmation page. So I tried it again and it was mine. Hit refresh and it changed to someone else&#8217;s email. Repeated that a few times with different browsers and sure enough I was able grab a number of different email addresses. So I mention this on Twitter but did not give any details. Just said they where leaking emails. I then go open up a helpdesk ticket with them. A few minutes later I get a response from one of Groupon&#8217;s social media people saying that &#8220;this is definitely not true&#8221; but she did not know the details.</p>
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" title="groupon.JPG" src="http://steverossen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/groupon.jpg" border="0" alt="groupon.JPG" width="457" height="387" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>She just assumed it was not problem. But in fact it was very true, can even <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pu6oaNnrBY">watch the video</a> that someone else made after hearing about it from me. I did email her directly and explained in detail how to get the email addresses. (That was hours before that blog posted the video.) She must have reproduced it because she quickly changed are tune and while would not admit the problem said she forwarded it to her technical staff.</p>
<p>While that was going on I exchanged several emails back and forth on the original helpdesk ticket I opened up. And guess what? They denied that they where having a problem. Said a few weeks ago they had a problem with a 3rd party email that went out. That of course had nothing to do with it. He then sent me two more emails denying that anything was wrong and became very condescending. Since I had better things to do I told him how felt which was next time someone submits a problem liking mine next time he may want to ask how to reproduce the issue before denying it because it really makes him look lazy.</p>
<p>Well a few hours later julie_mo emailed and said it was fixed. I went to the site and tested it and sure enough it was. I was actually impressed a major website like Groupon could get a flaw in their website fixed so fast. However I was not impressed at how long it took for them to even ask how to reproduce the problem and how they denied it without even testing.</p>
<p>Now back to our jobs on the network side of things. When a user comes and says that the network is down what are you going to do? Sometimes the network is down. Usually it is not but it is always worth checking as not every outage will show up with your monitoring tools. Check out the problem from the users perspectivem they will appreciate it and without users you have no need for the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steverossen.com/no-the-network-is-not-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t be that guy!</title>
		<link>http://steverossen.com/dont-be-that-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://steverossen.com/dont-be-that-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rossen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steverossen.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of us in IT have all been there. Sitting around talking about how something on the network is wrong and it was the old guys fault. They did something lazy or wrong or did not document well and because of something THEY did you are now running something sub-optimal and performance is suffering. We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of us in IT have all been there. Sitting around talking about how something on the network is wrong and it was the old guys fault. They did something lazy or wrong or did not document well and because of something THEY did you are now running something sub-optimal and performance is suffering. We have all been there. Now in these times I like to think would I have done the same? Why not? Do I really know what what made them choose what they did 2 to 3 or more gears ago? No I don&#8217;t so in many cases we need to cut the old guy some slack. Sometimes however we don&#8217;t. This is when something was clearly configured wrong, no description listed for ports on the switch or maybe redundancy that was setup wrong and would never work.</p>
<p>Well take this opportunity to fix the problem! At least create a plan to fix the issue. Don&#8217;t just sit around complaining about it, take some initiative and document what is wrong and detail the steps to fix it. It may not happen for many reasons (political, budget, etc) but at least you got off your butt and tried fixed it. If it is just poor documentation you have no excuses to not fix that.</p>
<p>Now think about what your are doing today. When you type a command will someone 2 years down the road be able to know exactly why you did that? What about port descriptions? Do you like coming into a network with no labels? Or what about when you do a &#8220;sho int status&#8221; and every port is labeled with server names but half are not connected? Clearly the documentation is wrong so can you trust the labels that are connected? Take the time to do right every time, even when removing something. What about network diagrams? Are yours done right? If someone walked into your network today would it take them 10 minutes or 10 hours to get a basic understanding?</p>
<p>The bottom line is take pride in your work and do it right. You should be happy to show of your configs and diagrams. Don&#8217;t be the guy that is blamed for everything years from now, be the guy they are still talking about how you did things the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steverossen.com/dont-be-that-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real content coming soon!</title>
		<link>http://steverossen.com/real-content-coming-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://steverossen.com/real-content-coming-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rossen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steverossen.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been laying low for far too long. I have some real content coming soon. First up I expect to a post on monolithic vs modular IOS on 6500&#8242;s. I have avoided real content because I have been so busy and did not want post sub-par work. Hopefully what I end up posting will meet that goal. See [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been laying low for far too long. I have some real content coming soon. First up I expect to a post on monolithic vs modular IOS on 6500&#8242;s. I have avoided real content because I have been so busy and did not want post sub-par work. Hopefully what I end up posting will meet that goal. See ya soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steverossen.com/real-content-coming-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

